By: Brian W. Budzynski
Through an international design competition called “Bridging the Drive,” the City of Chicago constructed a new signature pedestrian bridge at 41st Street and Lake Shore Drive.
The project’s primary goals were to connect the Bronzeville neighborhood with Lake Michigan, which is separated by Lake Shore Drive, while creating an inviting atmosphere with an aesthetically pleasing iconic structure resulting in a unique and memorable experience for users.
The new 41st Street Pedestrian Bridge is 1,500 ft in length and incorporates twin 240-ft-long inclined arches on graceful sweeping S-curves to span over Lake Shore Drive and the Metra Electric/CN Railroads. Unlike typical arch bridges, which are symmetric in horizontal and vertical directions, the 41st Street arch spans are on reverse curvature and on a long crest curve where the center between the arches is 7 ft higher than the outside ends of the arch at the approaches. A combination of quality design plans, an independent 3-D model developed by the fabricator, and close coordination between designer AECOM, construction engineer TranSystems, and contractor F.H. Paschen resulted in near-perfect execution of the project. Overall, the structure’s complex and complicated geometry was a challenge to not only design, but to fabricate and erect while maintaining the architectural integrity of the bridge.
“With the arches on this bridge inclined and on a horizontal curvature, we had to model everything carefully to make sure the geometry would work and to be able to advantage it for our structural analysis,” Michael Eichten, design project manager and vice president with AECOM, told Roads & Bridges. “It has very large torsional rotating forces that basically make the bridge want to roll itself over on itself.”
In order to maximize a limited footprint and minimize any interruption of service to the underlying railway, the project team decided on a temporary bridge to span the rail lines, which would ultimately allow all work on the main structure to take place above and away from rail traffic. Thus, a pair of 3-D models were employed—the first in design, and another once fabrication of the bridge elements was imminent.
“There were tight constraints on this site, with it going over the railroad,” Eichten went on. “The Metra (commuter rail) tracks have aerial catenary lines. We used LiDAR to locate the lines precisely. Metra has very limited closure times; we used the 3-D model to get the temporary bridge in place, which protected workers from the electric lines and protected the lines from all the work above them. We utilized it from a geometric standpoint to model the components of the bridge itself, and it fed right into our structural analysis.”
“After all the substructure work and as they were setting anchor bolts, crews were surveying the location and transferring this information into a 3-D model the bridge component fabricator was building,” added Brian Racine, resident engineer for TranSystems. “Essentially they created an as-built to make sure the connection points and all the substructure members fit up. They used it for all substructure concerns, such as fit-ups, clearances, and so forth.”